1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 772 F.Supp.2d
  5. 772 F.Supp.2d 268 (2011)
 

BUSBY v. CAPITAL ONE, N.A.

Civil Action No. 10-1025 (RMU).

772 F.Supp.2d 268 (2011)

Wanda BUSBY, Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL ONE, N.A. et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

March 28, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wanda Busby, Washington, DC, pro se.

Anand V. Ramana, McGuirewoods LLP, McLean, VA, David N. Prensky, Chasen & Chasen, Washington, DC, Jason M. Somensatto, Matthew William Lee, Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP, McLean, VA, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GRANTING CAPITAL ONE'S MOTION TO DISMISS; GRANTING PRENSKY'S MOTION TO PARTIALLY DISMISS

RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The pro se plaintiff, Wanda Busby, has asserted a variety of statutory and common law claims against the defendants, Capital One, N.A. ("Capital One") and attorney David Prensky ("Prensky"), in connection with a promissory note and deed of trust executed by the plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases