1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 711 F.Supp.2d
  5. 711 F.Supp.2d 472 (2010)
 

PLASTERERS' LOCAL UNION NO. 96 PENSION v. PERRY

Civil No. PJM 06-338.

711 F.Supp.2d 472 (2010)

PLASTERERS' LOCAL UNION NO. 96 PENSION PLAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Harold PERRY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

February 24, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan G. Rose, Emily Seymour Costin, Richard Siegel, Sheppard Mullin Richter and Hampton LLP, Washington, DC, James Randolph Napoli, McDermott Will and Emery, LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs.

Peter R. Kolker, Steven N. Herman, Zuckerman Spaeder LLP, John C. Hayes, Jr., Colin Walter O'Sullivan, John William Bramlette, Nixon Peabody LLP, Washington, DC, John G. Perazich, Law Offices of John Perazich, Washington, DC, Douglas Pendleton Rucker, George Olai Peterson, Sands Anderson Marks and Miller, PC, McLean, VA, for Defendants.

OPINION

PETER J. MESSITTE, District Judge.

The Court considers Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney Fees and Expenses [Paper No. 160]. For the following reasons, the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

I.

Plaintiffs brought suit against Lee Wagner, Sam D. Scholar, Ronald Beddow, Donald Molnar, Harry Perry, James Lertora, and Edgar Pepper, alleging that, while serving as fiduciaries to the Plasterers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases