1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 708 F.Supp.2d
  5. 708 F.Supp.2d 57 (2010)
 

PHAIR v. NEW PAGE CORP.

No. 09-cv-97-P-S.

708 F.Supp.2d 57 (2010)

David PHAIR, Plaintiff, v. NEW PAGE CORPORATION and Rumford Paper Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Maine.

April 15, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chad T. Hansen, Peter L. Thompson, Peter L. Thompson & Associates, Portland, ME, for Plaintiff.

Mark E. Dunlap, Robert W. Bower, Jr., Norman, Hanson & Detroy, Portland, ME, for Defendants.

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GEORGE Z. SINGAL, District Judge.

Plaintiff David Phair alleges that Defendants New Page Corporation and Rumford Paper Company terminated his employment in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA") and the Maine Human Rights Act ("MHRA"). Before the Court are Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 23) and Defendants' Motion to Exclude Evidence (Docket # 25). As explained herein, the Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases