1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 746 F.Supp.2d
  5. 746 F.Supp.2d 854 (2010)
 

ARRINGTON v. MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE CO.

Case No. 10-10975.

746 F.Supp.2d 854 (2010)

Wendy A. ARRINGTON, Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

September 29, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dale R. Burmeister, Jason R. Mathers, Harvey Kruse, Troy, MI, for Plaintiff.

Kenneth W. Gage, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP, Chicago, IL, Lisa M. Bruno, AT & T Michigan, Detroit, MI, Richard G. Finch, Hardy, Lewis, Birmingham, MI, Stacey Bentley, Paul Hastings, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT II OF THE COMPLAINT

DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.

Contending that her employer, the defendant, misclassified her job as a managerial position to avoid having to pay premium overtime wages, the plaintiff brought suit against defendant Michigan Bell under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and the Michigan Minimum Wage Law (MMWL). The statute of limitations in the FLSA is two years ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases