1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 715 F.Supp.2d
  5. 715 F.Supp.2d 552 (2010)
 

DURAMED PHARMACEUTICALS v. PADDOCK LABORATORIES

No. 09 Civ. 1905(LBS).

715 F.Supp.2d 552 (2010)

DURAMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Plaintiff, v. PADDOCK LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 1, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay Philip Lefkowitz, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York, NY, Nathan S. Mammen, Daniel F. Attridge, Jessica Christine Kaiser, Leslie M. Schmidt, Philip John Warrick, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, Washington, DC, Alexander F. MacKinnon, Nick G. Saros, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Benjamin Ostapuk, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Edgar H. Haug, Bryan Joseph Braunel, David Arnold Zwally, Porter F. Fleming, Frommer, Lawrence & Haug, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Paddock Laboratories, Inc.

OPINION

SAND, District Judge.

In this patent infringement action, Plaintiff Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (now Teva Women's Health, Inc.) ("Duramed") brings a motion for partial summary judgment, and Defendant Paddock Laboratories, Inc. ("Paddock") brings a motion for summary judgment of non-infringement. Duramed holds a patent that it contends covers its product Cenestin, a conjugated estrogen tablet used in hormone replacement therapy. Duramed contends...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases