1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 674 F.Supp.2d
  5. 674 F.Supp.2d 373 (2009)
 

F.T.C. v. BRONSON PARTNERS, LLC

Civil Action No. 3:04cv1866 (SRU).

674 F.Supp.2d 373 (2009)

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. BRONSON PARTNERS, LLC, Martin Howard, H & H Marketing, LLC, and Sandra Howard, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

December 4, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Deborah A. Marrone, Michele Stolls, Nur-Ul-Haq, Robin E. Eichen, Federal Trade Commission, New York, NY, John B. Hughes, U.S. Attorney's Office, New Haven, CT, for Plaintiff.

Andrew B. Lustigman, Scott Shaffer, Sheldon S. Lustigman, The Lustigman Firm, P.C., New York, NY, Barbara S. Miller, Brody, Wilkinson & Ober, Southport, CT, for Defendants.

RULING AND ORDER

STEFAN R. UNDERHILL, District Judge.

The Federal Trade Commission ("Commission") brought this enforcement action challenging as false advertising the claims that the defendants, Bronson Partners, LLC ("Bronson") and Martin Howard (collectively "defendants") made in their advertisements for two products: Chinese Diet Tea ("Diet Tea") and the Bio-Slim Patch ("Patch"). On July 10, 2008...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases