1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 702 F.Supp.2d
  5. 702 F.Supp.2d 548 (2010)
 

IN RE HYDROGEN PEROXIDE ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Civil Action No. 05-666. MDL Docket No. 1682.

702 F.Supp.2d 548 (2010)

In re HYDROGEN PEROXIDE ANTITRUST LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: Conopco, Inc., et al. v. Arkema, Inc., et al. and Conopco, Inc., et al. v. FMC Foret, S.A.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

March 31, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Blechman, Kenny, Nachwalter, Seymour, Arnold, Critchlow and Spector, Miami, FL, for Conopco, Inc., Reckitt Benckiser Inc.

Ralph E. Cascarilla, Walter & Haverfield, Cleveland, OH, for FMC Corporation.

Evan W. Davis, Michael I. Frankel, George G. Gordon, Christine C. Levin, Jeffrey W. Rubin, Joseph A. Tate, Dechert LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for FMC Corporation, FMC Foret S.A.

MEMORANDUM

DALZELL, Judge.

Two direct purchasers of hydrogen peroxide and derivative persalts, Conopco, Inc. and Reckett Benckiser, Inc., here pursue opt-out claims against FMC Corp. and FMC Foret S.A. (collectively "FMC")1 for purported price fixing in alleged violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1.2 These plaintiffs seek to recover damages for purchases of perborates...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases