1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 691 F.Supp.2d
  5. 691 F.Supp.2d 927 (2010)
 

HOEFT v. KASTEN

No. 09-cv-116-bbc.

691 F.Supp.2d 927 (2010)

Richard HOEFT, Plaintiff, v. Captain Michael KASTEN, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin.

March 5, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Hoeft, Park Falls, WI, pro se.

Karla Z. Keckhaver, Wisconsin Department of Justice, Madison, WI, for Defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.

Plaintiff Richard Hoeft is proceeding in forma pauperis on his claim that defendant Michael Kasten was deliberately in-different to plaintiff's risk of serious harm in violation of plaintiff's Eighth Amendment rights when he refused to transfer plaintiff out of the B side of the segregation unit. Jurisdiction is present. 28 U.S.C. § 1331.

Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases