1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 644 F.Supp.2d
  5. 644 F.Supp.2d 338 (2009)
 

HOLOWECKI v. FEDERAL EXP. CORP.

No. 02 Civ. 3355 (JSR).

644 F.Supp.2d 338 (2009)

Paul HOLOWECKI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

July 29, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David M. Wachtel, Earlene W. Rosenberg, Linda Y. Sroufe, Rose & Rose, P.C., Washington, DC, Richard Simon Weil, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs.

Christopher Carlsen, New York, NY, Edward J. Efkeman, Thomas W. Southerland, FedEx Express Legal Department, Memphis, TN, for Defendant.

David L. Rose, Rose & Rose, P.C., Washington, DC.

OPINION AND ORDER

JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge.

This aging age discrimination case, having made its way to the Supreme Court and back, is finally ready for final judgment.

The case was commenced in 2002 by twelve current and former employees of defendant Federal Express Corporation ("FedEx"), suing on behalf of themselves and seeking certification to represent other similarly situated FedEx employees. Plaintiffs allege that FedEx utilized...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases