1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 647 F.Supp.2d
  5. 647 F.Supp.2d 1200 (2009)
 

ORMCO CORP. v. ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Case No. CV 03-16 CAS (ANx).

647 F.Supp.2d 1200 (2009)

ORMCO CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division.

July 27, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles J. Crueger, David L. Debruin, John E. Flanagan, Joseph T. Miotke, Michael Best & Friedrich, Richard H. Marschall, Michael Best And Friedrich LLP, Milwaukee, WI, Christopher B. Mead, London & Mead, Washington, DC, Karin G. Pagnanelli, Thomas P. Lambert, Mitchell Silberberg and Knupp LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff.

Anne M. Rogaski, Daniel J. Furniss, John E. Lord, Susan C. Moon, Susan M. Spaeth, Heidi J. Kim, Jon V. Swenson, Gary H. Ritchey, Townsend Townsend & Crew, Palo Alto, CA, for Defendant.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is an action brought by plaintiff Ormco Corp. ("Ormco") against defendant Align Technology, Inc. ("Align") regarding the alleged infringement of four related Ormco patents: (1) U.S. Patent No. 5,447,432 ("the '432 patent"); (2) U.S. Patent No. 5,683,243 ("the '243 patent"); and (3) U.S. Patent No. 6...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases