1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 676 F.Supp.2d
  5. 676 F.Supp.2d 321 (2009)
 

TELECONFERENCE SYS. v. PROCTOR & GAMBLE

Civil Nos. 09-200 (JBS/JS), 09-632 (JBS/JS).

676 F.Supp.2d 321 (2009)

TELECONFERENCE SYSTEMS, Plaintiff, v. PROCTOR & GAMBLE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant. Teleconference Systems, Plaintiff, v. Hewlett-Packard Co., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

November 25, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joelle Eileen Polesky, Robert J. Katzenstein, Smith, Katzenstein, & Furlow, Wilmington, DE, Anthony G. Simon, Pro Hac Vice, Timothy Grochocinski, Pro Hac Vice, for Plaintiff.

Jack B. Blumenfeld, Andrew Colin Mayo, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, John G. Day, Caroline Hong, Lauren E. Maguire, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE, Angel Orrantia, Pro Hac Vice, Hector Ribera, Pro Hac Vice, Henry Z. Carbajal, Pro Hac Vice, Lynn Pasahow, Pro Hac Vice, Virginia K. Demarchi, Pro Hac Vice, for Defendants.

OPINION

JOEL SCHNEIDER, United States Magistrate Judge.

This Opinion addresses whether these consolidated patent infringement cases should be litigated in the District of Delaware or the Northern District of California. For the reasons to be discussed the Court finds that these cases should be transferred to California.1

This matter is before the Court on the following...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases