1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 662 F.Supp.2d
  5. 662 F.Supp.2d 967 (2009)
 

CHILCUTT v. FORD MOTOR CO.

No. 1:08cv116.

662 F.Supp.2d 967 (2009)

Carl D. CHILCUTT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division.

October 7, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles T. McGinnis, III, Mark Wayne Napier, Freking & Betz, Cincinnati, OH, Jennifer E. McKibben, John C. Bohdan, Glaser & Ebbs, Ft. Wayne, IN, for Plaintiffs.

Heather MacGregor Hawkins, Joseph Benjamin Russell, Thompson, Hine LLP, Cincinnati, OH, for Defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

S. ARTHUR SPIEGEL, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Ford Motor Company's Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 35), Plaintiffs Carl D. Chilcutt and Pam Chilcutt's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 41), and Defendant's Memorandum in reply thereto (doc. 44). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 35).

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases