1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 650 F.Supp.2d
  5. 650 F.Supp.2d 924 (2009)
 

ADVANCED SOFTWARE DESIGN CORPORATION v. FISERV, INC.

Case No. 4:07CV185 CDP.

650 F.Supp.2d 924 (2009)

ADVANCED SOFTWARE DESIGN CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FISERV, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division.

August 31, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Keith A. Rabenberg, Michael J. Hartley, Sara Weilert Gillette, Senniger Powers, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiffs.

Anthony S. Baish, William E. Duffin, William H. Levit, Jr., Godfrey and Kahn, S.C., Milwaukee, WI, Brian D. Roche, Michael P. Bregenzer, Michael M. Geoffrey, Raven Moore, Reed Smith LLP, Chicago, IL, John H. Quinn, III, Michael H. Longmeyer, Nicholas B. Clifford, Jr., Armstrong Teasdale, LLP, Martin M. Green, Green Jacobson, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CATHERINE D. PERRY, District Judge.

In order to decrypt a coded message, there must first be an encryption of that message. Similarly, in order to validate a negotiable instrument by reading and decrypting a security code, that code must first have been generated and printed on the instrument. The process of encryption is not an "environment" in which the process of decryption takes place. Rather, as the patent in this case demonstrates...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases