ORDER
SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge.
Before the Court is Dyson, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment. Dyson's motion is granted in part and denied in part for the following reasons.
I. Background
A. Procedural Background
This case is the third action in the past four years between Oreck and Dyson. In the first action, Oreck Holdings, LLC v. Dyson, Inc., No. 05-361, Oreck alleged that Dyson's "no loss of suction" advertisement...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.