1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 636 F.Supp.2d
  5. 636 F.Supp.2d 785 (2009)
 

WALKER v. MONSANTO CO. PENSION PLAN

Case Nos. 3;04-cv-436-JPG-PMF, 05-cv-736-JPG, 06-cv-3-JPG, 06-cv-139-JPG.

636 F.Supp.2d 785 (2009)

Grant M. WALKER, Edward Zeringue, and Richard W. Drake, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. MONSANTO COMPANY PENSION PLAN and Monsanto Company, Defendants. Glynn Davis, Eugene Forneris, and Juanita Hammond, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Solutia Inc. Employees' Pension Plan, Defendant. Fred Donaldson, Albert Walter III, Mary Clawson, Sandra Bellon, Audrey Sokoloski, and Carol Thomas, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Pharmacia Cash Balance Pension Plan, Pharmacia Corporation, Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, and Pfizer, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois.

June 11, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric L. Dirks, Norman E. Siegel, Patrick J. Stueve, Todd M. McGuire, Stueve, Siegel et al., Kansas City, MO, Michael B. Marker, Rex Carr, Rex Carr Law Firm, East St. Louis, IL, Jerome J. Schlichter, Matthew H. Armstrong, Schlichter, Bogard et al., St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiffs.

Carol Connor Cohen, Caroline T. English, Gretchen Dixon, Arent Fox PLLC, Washington, DC, Michael J. Nester, Donovan, Rose et al., Belleville, IL, Anne E. Rea, Chris K. Meyer, Erin E. Kelly, Mark B. Blocker, Neil H. Wyland, Priscilla E. Ryan, Ryan M. Sandrock, William F. Conlon, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL, Neal F. Perryman, Thomas P. Berra, Jr., Robert J. Golterman, Lewis, Rice et al., St. Louis, MO, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the motion for summary judgment on Count X filed by defendants Monsanto Company Pension Plan and Monsanto Company (collectively, "Monsanto") (Doc. 282). Plaintiff Edward Zeringue, class representative, has responded to the motion (Doc. 295), and Monsanto has replied to that response (Doc. 298). The Court also considers the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases