1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 589 F.Supp.2d
  5. 589 F.Supp.2d 944 (2008)
 

WHITTLE v. PROCTER & GAMBLE

Case No. 1:06-cv-744.

589 F.Supp.2d 944 (2008)

Keith WHITTLE, Plaintiff, v. PROCTER & GAMBLE, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

December 1, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. Greene, III, James R. Greene III & Associates, Dayton, OH, for Plaintiff.

Kevin W. Kirsch, Ryan Michael Bednarczuk, Taft, Stettinius & Hollister LLP, Cincinnati, OH, Matthew J. Wiles, Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, Dayton, OH, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

JOHN D. HOLSCHUH, District Judge.

Plaintiff Keith Whittle's Amended Complaint, filed against Procter & Gamble ("P & G") and Theodore (Ted) and Traci Cummings, asserts claims of breach of oral agreement, fraudulent inducement, and patent infringement. This matter is currently before the Court on three dispositive motions: (1) Ted Cummings' motion for summary judgment on the breach of oral agreement claim; (2)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases