1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.4th
  4. 53 F.4th
  5. 53 F.4th 368 (2022)
 

CAUDILL SEED & WAREHOUSE CO. INC. v. JARROW FORMULAS, INC.

No. 21-5345.

53 F.4th 368 (2022)

CAUDILL SEED & WAREHOUSE CO., INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JARROW FORMULAS, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: November 10, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: David R. Carpenter, SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Appellant. Benjamin J. Lewis, DENTONS BINGHAM GREENEBAUM LLP, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: David R. Carpenter, SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP, Los Angeles, California, Christopher A. Eiswerth, Daniel J. Hay, SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Benjamin J. Lewis, J. Mark Grundy, Jared A. Cox, Amanda D. Reed, Kyle W. Miller, DENTONS BINGHAM GREENEBAUM LLP, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellee.

The court delivered a PER CURIAM opinion. MOORE, J. (pp. 395-97), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

OPINION

Caudill Seed & Warehouse Co. manufactures an important ingredient in certain nutritional supplements. Jarrow Formulas, Inc., a customer of Caudill's, wanted to get into this manufacturing business. To do this, Jarrow decided to lure away Caudill's Director of Research, Kean Ashurst, and learn Caudill's manufacturing process...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases