1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.4th
  4. 37 F.4th
  5. 37 F.4th 70 (2022)
 

UNITED STATES v. YUNG

No. 19-1640 & 20-3448.

37 F.4th 70 (2022)

UNITED STATES of America, v. Ho Ka Terence YUNG, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Filed: June 13, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter Goldberger [ARGUED], 50 Rittenhouse Place, Ardmore, PA 19003, Edson A. Bostic, Tieffa N. Harper, Federal Public Defender's Office, 800 King Street, Suite 200, Wilmington, DE 19801, Counsel for Appellant.

Ruth Mandelbaum [ARGUED], Shawn A. Weede, United States Attorney's Office, 1313 N. Market St., Hercules Building, Suite 400, Wilmington, DE 19801, Counsel for Appellee.

Before: RESTREPO, BIBAS, and ROTH, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

The First Amendment limits the government's power to punish offensive or annoying speech. Convicted under a cyberstalking statute, Ho Ka Terence Yung challenges that law as overbroad. But to avoid this problem, we read the statute narrowly and so will affirm his conviction.

Yung also challenges...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases