1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 988 F.3d
  5. 988 F.3d 174 (2021)
 

SULZER MIXPAC AG v. A&N TRADING CO.

Docket No. 19-2951 August Term, 2020.

988 F.3d 174 (2021)

SULZER MIXPAC AG, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. A&N TRADING COMPANY, A&N Trading Co., Ltd., and Sung Bin An, aka Tony An, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided: February 18, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

JOSHUA B. KATZ , Kent, Beatty & Gordon, LLP, ( Jack A. Gordon , on the brief), New York, NY, for Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants A&N Trading Co., A&N Trading Co., Ltd. and Sung Bin An, aka Tony An.

MICHAEL T. MURPHY , Global IP Counselors, LLP ( Daniel Hwang , Suzanne E. Konrad , on the brief), Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee Sulzer Mixpac AG.

Charles D. Cole, Jr. , Newman Myers Kreines Harris, P.C. (on the brief), New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee Sulzer Mixpac AG.

Before: JACOBS, POOLER, and BIANCO, Circuit Judges.

If a product's trade dress is functional, there can be no trade dress protection. The functionality doctrine is at the core of the parties' dispute. Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee Sulzer Mixpac AG ("Mixpac") and Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants A&N Trading Company, A&N Trading Co., Ltd., and Sung Bin An...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases