1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 987 F.3d
  5. 987 F.3d 1358 (2021)
 

SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. DROPBOX, INC.

2019-2196, 2019-2199.

987 F.3d 1358 (2021)

SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. DROPBOX, INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant. Funambol, Inc., Defendant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: February 12, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Lee Hogge, Dentons US LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Rajesh Charles Noronha, Kirk Robert Ruthenberg; Kevin R. Greenleaf, Lovettsville, VA.

Adam Harber, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-cross-appellant. Also represented by Debmallo Shayon Ghosh, David M. Krinsky, Christopher Mandernach, Thomas H.L. Selby.

Before Prost, Chief Judge, Reyna and Taranto, Circuit Judges.

Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. appeals the district court's decisions that all asserted claims, drawn to technology for synchronizing data across multiple devices, are either invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 112, paragraph 2, or not infringed. Defendant Dropbox, Inc. cross-appeals asserting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases