1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. NEOLOGY, INC. v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
 

NEOLOGY, INC. v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

No. 2018-1338.

NEOLOGY, INC., Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, KAPSCH TRAFFICCOM USA, INC., KAPSCH TRAFFICCOM HOLDING CORP., KAPSCH TRAFFICCOM CANADA INC., STAR SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL LTD., STAR RFID CO., LTD., Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: April 19, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

VINAY VIJAY JOSHI , Amin Turocy & Watson LLP, San Jose, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by DANIEL W. BEDELL , ANTHONY KIM , ANDREW TIMOTHY OLIVER .

CATHY CHEN , Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by DOMINIC L. BIANCHI , WAYNE W. HERRINGTON , SIDNEY A. ROSENZWEIG .

NATHAN S. MAMMEN , Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for intervenors. Also represented by GREGG F. LOCASCIO , BRIAN H. GOLD .

Before TARANTO, SCHALL, and CHEN, Circuit Judges.

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Neology filed a complaint with the International Trade Commission in 2015, alleging, as now relevant, infringement of claims 13, 14, and 25 of its U.S. Patent No. 8,325,044 and claims 1, 2, and 4 of its U.S. Patent No. 8,587,436. The patents, which share a specification...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases