1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 921 F.3d
  5. 921 F.3d 337 (2019)
 

NATOFSKY v. CITY OF NEW YORK

No. 17-2757 August Term, 2018.

921 F.3d 337 (2019)

Richard NATOFSKY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Susan Pogoda, Shaheen Ulon, Mark Peters, and John and Jane Doe, said names being fictitious, the persons intended being those who aided and abetted the unlawful conduct of the named defendants, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided: April 18, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT: William W. Cowles , ( Samuel O. Maduegbuna , on the brief), Maduegbuna Cooper LLP, New York, New York.

FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES: Melanie T. West , Assistant Corporation Counsel, ( Richard Dearing , Claude S. Platton , Of Counsel, on the brief), for Zachary W. Carter , Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, New York, New York.

Judge Chin dissents in a separate opinion.

Plaintiff Richard Natofsky appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granting summary judgment to Defendants (Buchwald, J.). Natofsky served as the Director of Budget and Human Resources at the New York City Department...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases