LORENZO v. SESSIONS

No. 15-70814.

902 F.3d 930 (2018)

Elisio Atenia LORENZO, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed August 29, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benjamin F. Aiken (argued), Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, D.C.; Cathy C. Shyong , Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Menlo Park, California; Karen Johnson-McKewan , Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, San Francisco, California; for Petitioner.

Scott G. Stewart (argued), Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge, and Raymond C. Fisher and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

This case raises a novel yet straightforward question in our application of Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990): whether the Taylor analysis must be performed twice if a state statute contains two layers of disjunctive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases