1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 880 F.3d
  5. 880 F.3d 1048 (2018)
 

CALLERID4U v. MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES

Nos. 15-35028, 15-35029.

880 F.3d 1048 (2018)

CALLERID4U, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES INC., dba Verizon Business Services, Defendant-Appellee. CallerID4u, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bellsouth Long Distance, Inc., dba AT&T Long Distance Service, Defendant, and AT&T Corp., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed January 22, 2018.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew Alexander Henry (argued), McCollough Henry PC, West Lake Hills, Texas, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Joshua D. Branson (argued), Melanie L. Bostwick, and Scott H. Angstreich, Kellogg Huber Hansen Todd Evans & Figel PLLC, Washington, D.C.; Demetrios G. Metropoulos, Mayer Brown LLP, Chicago, Illinois; for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: Ferdinand F. Fernandez, Consuelo M. Callahan, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

Under the Communications Act of 1934 and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rules, CallerID4u was required to either file a valid tariff setting rates for local telecommunications services or enter into a negotiated agreement regarding compensation for services rendered. See 47 U.S.C. § 203...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases