JUDY PRESCOTT BARNETT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CONNECTICUT LIGHT & POWER COMPANY, NORTHEAST UTILITIES, NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE COMPANY, UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Anthony M. Fitzgerald ( Sherwin M. Yoder , on the brief), Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey LLP, New Haven, CT, for Connecticut Light & Power Company, Northeast Utilities, and Northeast Utilities Service Company, Appearing for Appellees.
Jonathan M. Freiman , Wiggen & Dana LLP, New Haven, CT, for United Illuminating Company.
Present: ROSEMARY S. POOLER, REENA RAGGI, PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
SUMMARY ORDER
RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT'S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION "SUMMARY ORDER"). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
