1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MAXWELL v. CLARKE
 

MAXWELL v. CLARKE

No. 13-7056.

BRADLEY MAXWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HAROLD CLARKE; JAMES PARKS; GEORGE HINKLE; GREGORY HALLOWAY; DAVID ZOOK; R.C. MATHENA; DENNIS COLLINS; T. FARRIS; B. D. COLLINS; J. W. CARICO; C. L. STACY; R. C. WILLIAMS; H. R. HENSLEY; M. COUNTS; BRENDA RAVIZER, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided: September 27, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bradley Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se.

Kate Elizabeth Dwyre , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

UNPUBLISHED

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM.

Bradley Maxwell appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act ("RLUIPA"). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases