In re ATM FEE ANTITRUST LITIGATION.
Pamela Brennan; Terry Crayton; Darla Martinez, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Concord EFS, Inc.; Bank One Corporation; Bank One, N.A.; J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.; Citibank (West), F.S.B.DE; Suntrust Banks, Inc.; Wachovia Corporation; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; Servus Financial Corp.; Citibank, N.A.; First Data Corporation; Bank of America, N.A., Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted December 6, 2011.
Filed July 12, 2012.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Joseph R. Saveri, Brendan P. Glackin, and Andrew S. Kingsdale, Leiff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, San Francisco, CA; Merrill G. Davidoff (argued), Bart D. Cohen, and Michael J. Kane, Berger & Montague, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, for the plaintiffs-appellants.
W. Stephen Smith and Deanne E. Maynard (argued), Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, D.C.; Robert S. Stern and Sylvia Rivera, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellee J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., successor-in-interest to Bank One, N.A.
Sonya D. Winner (argued) and Anita F. Stork, Covington & Burling LLP, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellee Bank of America, N.A.
Stephen V. Bomse, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellee Suntrust Bank, Inc.
David F. Graham and Eric H. Grush, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL, for defendants-appellees Citibank, N.A. and Citibank (West), FSB.
Jack R. Nelson, Reed Smith LLP, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellee Wachovia Corp.
Daniel M. Wall and Joshua N. Holian, Latham & Watkins, San Francisco, CA, and Donald I. Baker, Baker & Miller, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellees Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Servus Financial Corp.
Peter E. Moll and Brian D. Wallach, Cadwalader, Wickcersham & Taft LLP, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellees Concord EFS, Inc. and First Data Corp.
Before CARLOS F. LUCERO, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, and N. RANDY SMITH, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
OPINION
N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs-Appellants (Plaintiffs) are automated teller machine (ATM) cardholders, who allege horizontal price fixing of fees paid to the ATM owners by the banks (issuing the ATM cards to the cardholders) when cardholders retrieve cash from an ATM not owned by their bank. Plaintiffs do not directly pay the allegedly fixed fee; therefore, as indirect purchasers, Supreme Court precedent prohibits Plaintiffs from bringing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
