ALVIN BUTNICK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
GENERAL MOTORS CORP., GRUMMAN AEROSPACE CORP., NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP., ORION BUS INDUS., INC., DAIMLER BUSES NORTH AMERICA, INC., NEW FLYER INDUS. LTD., KPS CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP, HARVEST PARTNERS, INC., HARVEST PARTNERS FUND IV, LP, NEW FLYER INDUS. INC., NEW FLYER OF AMERICA, INC., NOVA BUS INC., TRANSPORTATION MANUFACTURING CORP., PREVOST CAR (US) INC., DETROIT DIESEL CORP., CUMMINS INC., CATERPILLAR INC., NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., successor to GRUMMAN AEROSPACE CORP., f/k/a NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP., Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
July 11, 2012.
July 11, 2012.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
DAVID C. FREDERICK , Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C., Washington, DC ( Scott K. Attaway , Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C., Washington, DC, John E. Durst, Jr. , The Durst Law Firm, P.C., Syosset, NY, John C. Dearie , Law Offices of John C. Dearie, New York, NY, on the brief), for Appellants.
Gilbert S. Keteltas , Baker Hostetler LLP, Washington, DC, James H. Keale , Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP, Newark, NJ, for Defendant-Appellee Caterpillar Inc.;
> D. Alan Rudlin , George P. Sibley , Hunton & Williams, LLP, (Richmond VA), Richmond, VA, for Defendants-Appellees General Motors Corp., Grumman Aerospace Corp., Northrop Grumman Corp., and Northrop Grumman Systems Corp., f/k/a Northrop Grumman Corp. and successor to Grumman Aerospace Corp.;
Victor L. Prial , Hunton & Williams, LLP (NYC), New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellee Northrop Grumman Systems Corp., f/k/a Northrop Grumman Corp. and successor to Grumman Aerospace Corp.;
Thomas J. Maimone , Maimone & Associates PLLC, Mineola, NY, for Defendants-Appellees Nova Bus Inc. and Prevost Car (US) Inc.;
Samuel Goldblatt , Nixon Peabody LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellee Cummins Inc.
Present: RALPH K. WINTER, JOSÉ A. CABRANES, SUSAN L. CARNEY, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the February 16, 2011 judgment of the District Court be AFFIRMED.
Appellants appeal from a judgment of the District Court dismissing their consolidated complaints on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We assume familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of this case, some of which we...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.