1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. KAMMERER v. MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN
 

KAMMERER v. MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN

No. 11-2422-cv.

KENNETH KAMMERER and THOMAS HALLIGAN, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN and BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN, as Plan Administrator, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 3, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

EDGAR PAUK , Law Offices of Edgar Pauk, Brooklyn, New York ( Robert Bach , Law Office of Robert J. Bach, Esq., New York, New York, on the brief), for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

MYRON D. RUMELD ( Anthony S. Cacace , on the brief), Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, New York, for Defendants-Appellees.

Present: RALPH K. WINTER, CHESTER J. STRAUB, DENNY CHIN, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment and order of the district court are AFFIRMED.

Plaintiffs-appellants Kenneth Kammerer and Thomas Halligan, motion picture studio mechanics, appeal from the district court's: (1) March 31, 2011, judgment entered pursuant to its March 31, 2011, opinion and order granting summary judgment to defendants-appellees Motion Picture Industry...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases