1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 681 F.3d
  5. 681 F.3d 1055 (2012)
 

HEXCEL CORP. v. INEOS POLYMERS, INC.

No. 10-56765.

681 F.3d 1055 (2012)

HEXCEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INEOS POLYMERS, INC., f/k/a BP Amoco Polymers, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided June 1, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John DeQ. Briggs (argued), Michael L. Keeley , Daniel J. Matheson , Washington D.C., for plaintiff-appellant Hexcel Corp.

Corey C. Watson , Los Angeles, Scott W. Fowkes (argued), Kathleen Ehrhart , Russell King , Chicago, IL, for defendant-appellee Ineos Polymers, Inc.

Before: BETTY B. FLETCHER, ANDREW J. KLEINFELD, and MILAN D. SMITH, JR., Circuit Judges.

OPINION

M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-Appellant Hexcel Corporation (Hexcel) sued Defendant-Appellee Ineos Polymers, Inc., formerly known as BP Amoco Polymers, Inc. (BP Amoco) on November 26, 2008 for antitrust injuries it allegedly suffered as the result of a carbon fiber price-fixing scheme, beginning in 1992. To avoid the effect of the applicable four-year statute of limitations, 15 U.S.C. § 15b, Hexcel contends that the statute of limitations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases