1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 604 F.3d
  5. 604 F.3d 1142 (2010)
 

ADAM BROS. FARMING v. COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA

No. 09-55315.

604 F.3d 1142 (2010)

ADAM BROS. FARMING, INC., a California Corporation; Iceberg Holdings, L.L.C., a California Limited Liability Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA, a political subdivision of the State of California; Santa Barbara County Planning and Development Department, a department of the County of Santa Barbara; Daniel H. Gira, in his official capacity of Deputy Director of Santa Barbara County Planning and Development Department; Elihu Gevirtz, in his official capacity as Deputy Director of Santa Barbara County Planning and Development Department; Katherine Rindlaub, in her official capacity as a biological consultant for the County of Santa Barbara; Noel Langle, in his official capacity as Deputy Director of Santa Barbara Zoning Administration Division, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed May 14, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. David Breemer, Pacific Legal Foundation, Sacramento, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Lisa A. Rothstein, Deputy County Counsel, Santa Barbara, CA, for the defendants-appellees.

Before: HARRY PREGERSON and ROBERT R. BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and JAMES L. GRAHAM, Senior District Judge.

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

Adam Bros. Farming, Inc. and Iceberg Holdings, L.L.C. (collectively "Adam Bros.") appeal from the district court's dismissal of their joint complaint. Adam Bros. sued the County of Santa Barbara and several of its employees (collectively "the county") in federal court, alleging that the county had, through a false wetland delineation, temporarily taken its land without providing just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment. The district...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases