BEYNUM v. ARCH TRAINING CENTER

No. 09-AA-83.

998 A.2d 316 (2010)

Rhashida BEYNUM, Petitioner, v. ARCH TRAINING CENTER, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided June 24, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rhashida Beynum, pro se.

Respondent Arch Training Center did not file a brief.

Before RUIZ and OBERLY, Associate Judges, and FARRELL, Senior Judge.


RUIZ, Associate Judge:

Petitioner, Rhashida Beynum, challenges the Office of Administrative Hearings's determination that she is not eligible to receive unemployment compensation benefits because she voluntarily quit her employment at Arch Training Center without "good cause connected with the work." Because the Administrative Law Judge did not address all of the relevant portions of petitioner's testimony in her "good cause" analysis, we reverse and remand for further...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases