1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.5th
  4. 85 Cal.App.5th
  5. 85 Cal.App.5th 901 (2022)
 

BEASLEY v. TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. A164199.

85 Cal.App.5th 901 (2022)

MAXINE BEASLEY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

November 30, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The Weston Firm and Gregory S. Weston , for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Donahue Fitzgerald and David M. Jolley , for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

In this putative class action, plaintiff Maxine Beasley sued defendant Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (Tootsie Roll), alleging violations of federal and state law arising from the use of partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs) in Tootsie Roll's products between 2010 and 2016. In her operative first amended complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases