DOE v. REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

No. A161546.

80 Cal.App.5th 282 (2022)

JOHN DOE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant and Respondent; JANE ROE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

June 24, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steptoe & Johnson, Robyn C. Crowther , Melanie A. Ayerh ; Public Counsel Law Center, Kathryn A. Eidmann , Amanda Savage , Tara Ford , Noreen A. Farrell ; Equal Rights Advocates, Brenda Star Adams and Maha Ibrahim for Appellant.

Family Violence Law Center, Erin Scott , Stephanie Penrod ; L.L. Dunn Law Firm and Laura L. Dunn as Amici Curiae on behalf of Appellant.

California Women's Law Center, Chelsea Mutual and Elise Brumbach as Amici Curiae on behalf of Appellant.

Hathaway Parker, Mark M. Hathaway and Jenna E. Parker for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Munger, Tolles & Olson, Hailyn J. Chen and Teresa Alexandra Reed Dippo for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

John Doe filed a petition for writ of mandate against the Regents of the University of California (the University), seeking to set aside the University's decision to discipline John for sexually assaulting Jane Roe.1 The trial court granted the petition, finding John was not afforded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases