1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.5th
  4. 79 Cal.App.5th
  5. 79 Cal.App.5th 1118 (2022)
 

MEZA v. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE CO.

No. B317119.

79 Cal.App.5th 1118 (2022)

DAVE MEZA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

June 17, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The Dion-Kindem Law Firm, Peter R. Dion-Kindem ; The Blanchard Law Group and Lonnie C. Blanchard for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Paul Hastings, Raymond Bertrand , James de Haan ; Mayor Brown, Shaeff | Jaffe and Donald M. Falk for Defendant and Respondent.

O'Melveny & Myers, Adam Karr and Heather Welles for Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and California Chamber of Commerce as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Max C. Fischer and Aimee Mackay for California Employment Law Council and Employers Group as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

OPINION

Dave Meza filed this consolidated class action lawsuit against his former employer, Pacific Bell Telephone Company (Pacific Bell). Meza alleged Pacific Bell violated California law by failing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases