JANE DOE NO. 1 v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

No. B310131.

79 Cal.App.5th 410 (2022)

JANE DOE NO. 1 et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

June 1, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

FEM Law Group, F. Edie Mermelstein ; Rizio Lipinsky and Darren Pirozzi for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Perkins Coie, Bobbie J. Wilson , Julie L. Hussey , Julian Feldbein-Vinderman and Gregory F. Miller for Defendants and Respondents.

Morrison & Foerster and James R. Sigel for Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

The instant appeal is from a judgment of dismissal following a successful demurrer by respondents Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier-CA, LLC. and Rasier, LLC (collectively, the Uber entities), to a complaint filed against them by appellants, Jane Does Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (collectively, the Jane Does). The Jane...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases