PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INS. CO. v. SMG HOLDINGS, INC.

No. C082841.

44 Cal.App.5th 834 (2019)

PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SMG HOLDINGS, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

December 31, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nielsen Katibah , James C. Neilsen , Daniel N. Katibah and Thomas H. Nienow for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Pagliero & Associates, James R. Pagliero and Candace M. Pagliero for Defendant and Respondent.

Clapp, Moroney, Vucinichi, Beeman & Scheley and Christopher J. Beeman for Defendant and Respondent.

Morales, Fierro & Reeves and Ramiro Morales for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

This case concerns whether a binding arbitration clause in an insurance policy issued by plaintiff Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, applies to a third party, defendant SMG Holdings, Inc. The trial court ruled it does not. We conclude it does.

The policy had been issued to Future Farmers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases