1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 232 Cal.App.4th
  5. 232 Cal.App.4th 32 (2014)
 

ANNOCKI v. PETERSON ENTERPRISES, LLC

No. B251434.

232 Cal.App.4th 32 (2014)

180 Cal. Rptr. 3d 474

EILEEN ANNOCKI et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. PETERSON ENTERPRISES, LLC, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

November 14, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Liddy Law Firm, Donald G. Liddy; Johnston & Hutchinson and Thomas J. Johnston for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Early, Maslach & O'Shea, James Grafton Randall; Law Offices of Roxanne Huddleston and Roxanne Huddleston for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

Plaintiffs Eileen Annocki and Joseph Annocki appeal judgment of dismissal of their third amended complaint (TAC) for damages based on the death of their son Joseph M. Annocki. The trial court held that defendant Peterson Enterprises, LLC (defendant), had no duty to plaintiffs' decedent, who was killed in an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases