1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 224 Cal.App.4th
  5. 224 Cal.App.4th 210 (2014)
 

CITY OF OAKLAND v. OAKLAND POLICE & FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM

No. A136769.

224 Cal.App.4th 210 (2014)

169 Cal. Rptr. 3d 51

CITY OF OAKLAND, Plaintiffs and Respondents. v. OAKLAND POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM et al., Defendants and Appellants; RETIRED OAKLAND POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION et al., Interveners and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

As modified March 26, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nossaman, Stephen N. Roberts and James H. Vorhis, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Paul L. More; Davis, Cowell & Bowe, W. David Holsberry and Sarah Grossman-Swenson for Interveners and Appellants.

Olson Hagel & Fishburn and Richard C. Miadich for Defendants and Appellants.

OPINION

REARDON, Acting P. J. —

In this appeal, we revisit the provisions of the Oakland City Charter that determine how retirement benefits are calculated for members of the Oakland Police and Fire Retirement System (PFRS). The Retired Oakland Police Officers Association, along with several PFRS members and beneficiaries (collectively, the Association), appeal from a judgment granting a peremptory writ of mandate and declaratory relief...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases