1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 195 Cal.App.4th
  5. 195 Cal.App.4th 40 (2011)
 

BENJAMIN, WEILL & MAZER v. KORS

No. A125732.

195 Cal.App.4th 40 (2011)

BENJAMIN, WEILL & MAZER, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NANCY HURWITZ KORS, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

May 5, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary Steven Garfinkle and Maria Garfinkle for Defendant and Appellant.

Benjamin, Weill & Mazer, Andrew J. Weill , David R. Benjamin and Kenneth D. Schnu for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

KLINE, P. J.—

This case involves a fee dispute between a law firm, respondent Benjamin, Weill & Mazer, a professional corporation (BWM), and its former client, appellant Nancy Hurwitz Kors. After Kors refused to pay the full amount billed her, BWM sued her for breach of the parties' fee agreement. Based on the arbitration clause in the agreement, Kors moved to compel arbitration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases