CANANDAIGUA WINE COMPANY, INC. v. COUNTY OF MADERA

No. F059256.

CANANDAIGUA WINE COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. COUNTY OF MADERA, Defendant and Appellant; MADERA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS et al., Real Parties in Interest and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

Filed April 20, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cota Cole & Associates, Dennis M. Cota and Carolyn J. Frank for Defendant and Appellant and Real Parties in Interest and Appellants.

Winston & Strawn, Charles J. Moll III , Amanda L. Groves and Troy M. Van Dongen for Plaintiff and Respondent.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

OPINION

LEVY, Acting P.J.

Under Government Code section 800 and Revenue and Taxation Code section 1611.6, if a reviewing court determines that the findings made by a county assessment appeals board are so deficient that a remand is required, the complaining taxpayer, as the prevailing party, may collect reasonable attorney fees from the county.

In this matter, respondent, Canandaigua Wine Company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases