1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 193 Cal.App.4th
  5. 193 Cal.App.4th 903 (2011)
 

BANNING RANCH CONSERVANCY v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. G044223.

193 Cal.App.4th 903 (2011)

BANNING RANCH CONSERVANCY, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY, Respondent; CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

March 22, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger, Andrew W. Schwartz, Robert S. Perlmutter, Deborah L. Miller and Erin B. Chalmers for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

David R. Hunt, City Attorney, and Kyle E. Rowen, Deputy City Attorney, for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

THE COURT.*—

Litigants have a right to be represented by counsel of their choice, particularly in substantive areas requiring particular expertise. In short, they have the right to hire the best professionals for their team. But they cannot induce their adversary's attorney to switch sides midstream. There is a rule of automatic disqualification...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases