1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. TAKAHASHI v. SNELL & WILMER, LLP
 

TAKAHASHI v. SNELL & WILMER, LLP

No. G041728.

WILLIAM H. TAKAHASHI, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, v. SNELL & WILMER LLP, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

Filed January 12, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roxanne Huddleston for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant.

Pistone & Wolder, Thomas A. Pistone ; Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Robin Meadow and Cynthia E. Tobisman for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

OPINION

O'LEARY, J.

William H. Takahashi appeals from a judgment in favor of Snell & Wilmer LLP (Snell & Wilmer) on his complaint for legal malpractice against Snell & Wilmer and awarding Snell & Wilmer $838,837 in unpaid legal fees on its cross-complaint. Takahashi contends the trial court erroneously instructed the jury in accordance with CACI No. 203, that if a party provided weaker evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases