1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 367 P.3d
  5. 367 P.3d 72 (2016)
 

WATKINS v. ARPAIO

No. 1 CA-CV 14-0707.

367 P.3d 72 (2016)

Lee WATKINS, an individual, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Sheriff Joseph M. ARPAIO, in his individual and official capacities as Sheriff of Maricopa County, Defendant/Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1.

February 2, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robbins & Curtin, PLLC By Joel B. Robbins, Anne E. Findling, Phoenix, Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellant.

Sacks Tierney, PA By James W. Armstrong, Jeffrey S. Leonard, Scottsdale, Counsel for Defendant/Appellee.

Presiding Judge DIANE M. JOHNSEN delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Judge KENT E. CATTANI and Judge JOHN C. GEMMILL joined.

OPINION

¶ 1 Lee Watkins argues the superior court erred by dismissing on limitations grounds his claims against Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio for intentional infliction of emotional distress and false-light invasion of privacy. He argues the torts were "continuing wrongs" that did not finally accrue until less...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases