1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 328 P.3d
  5. 328 P.3d 1049 (2014)
 

HANNOSH v. SEGAL

No. 1 CA-CV 12-0811.

328 P.3d 1049 (2014)

Jerry HANNOSH, a married man, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. David P. SEGAL and Jane Doe Segal, his wife; Zalman Segal and Jane Doe Segal, his wife; Joseph Segal and Jane Doe Segal, his wife, Defendants/Appellees. Jerry Hannosh, a married man, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. David P. Segal and Jane Doe Segal, his wife; Zalman Segal and Jane Doe Segal, his wife; Joseph Segal and Jane Doe Segal, his wife, Defendants/Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1.

May 22, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey M. Proper, PLLC, Phoenix By Jeffrey M. Proper, for Plaintiff/Appellant Jerry Hannosh.

David P. Segal, Zalman Segal, Phoenix Joseph Segal, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants/Appellees.

OPINION

PORTLEY, Judge.

¶ 1 We are asked to decide whether a person gambling on Internet websites can bring a private right of action to recover his losses under the Organized Crime, Fraud and Terrorism Act, Arizona Revised Statutes ("A.R.S.") section 13-2314.04(A),1 also known as Arizona RICO or Arizona's racketeering statute. Because we agree with the superior court that such a cause of action is unavailable, we affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases