1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 298 P.3d
  5. 298 P.3d 224 (2013)
 

STATE v. SALAZAR

Nos. 1 CA-CR 12-0167, 1 CA-CR 12-0170, 1 CA-CR 12-0171, 1 CA-CR 12-0184.

298 P.3d 224 (2013)

STATE of Arizona, Appellant, v. Steven SALAZAR, Sergio Zuno Trejo, Oswaldo Ramirez, and Miguel Solorzano, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C.

March 28, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jon R. Smith, Yuma County Attorney by Roger Nelson, Chief Criminal Deputy, and Deann L. Sandry, Deputy County Attorney, Yuma, Attorneys for Appellant.

Cameron A. Morgan, Scottsdale, Attorney for Appellees.

OPINION

SWANN, Judge.

¶ 1 The State of Arizona appeals the trial court's suppression of evidence obtained through a wiretap. We hold that an application for wiretap must satisfy the literal requirements of A.R.S. § 13-3010. Because the application in this case did not contain the applicant's sworn statement of supporting facts as required by that statute, we affirm the trial court's suppression order.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases