1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 297 P.3d
  5. 297 P.3d 931 (2013)
 

WELLS v. FELL

No. 2 CA-SA 2012-0076.

297 P.3d 931 (2013)

Calisto Mariko WELLS, Petitioner, v. Hon. Howard FELL, Judge Pro Tempore of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Pima, Respondent, and The State of Arizona, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A.

February 28, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The McDonald Law Firm, P.C. By Alfred McDonald, Tucson, Attorney for Petitioner.

Barbara LaWall, Pima County Attorney By Nicolette Kneup, Tucson, Attorneys for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 In this special action, petitioner Calisto Wells challenges the respondent judge's ruling ordering him to disclose police-officer witness statements made during interviews of which the state had no notice, despite his intent to use the statements solely for impeachment. We accept special action jurisdiction to clarify that a trial court may, upon a showing of substantial need and undue hardship, order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases