1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 252 P.3d
  5. 252 P.3d 1033 (2010)
 

STATE v. LINDNER

No. 1 CA-CR 09-0583.

252 P.3d 1033 (2010)

STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Michael LINDNER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A.

September 28, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary Verburg, City Attorney by Nathan Watts, Assistant City Prosecutor, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellee.

Laurie A. Herman, Attorney at Law by Laurie A. Herman, Scottsdale, Attorney for Appellant.

OPINION

BARKER, Judge.

¶ 1 Michael Lindner appeals the superior court's ruling affirming his municipal court conviction for extreme DUI. Lindner argues that the superior court erred in finding Arizona Revised Statutes section 28-1323 (Supp. 2009) constitutional, and in affirming the municipal court's refusal to impose sanctions on the State for failure to produce the Intoxilyzer source code. For the reasons that follow, we reject Lindner's claim of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases