1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 227 P.3d
  5. 227 P.3d 475 (2010)
 

AKSAMIT v. KRAHN

No. 1 CA-CV 08-0806.

227 P.3d 475 (2010)

In re the Marriage of Patricia M. AKSAMIT, Petitioner/Appellee, v. Greg KRAHN, Respondent/Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

March 18, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Office of Danny L. Klein By Danny L. Klein, Scottsdale, Attorney for Petitioner/Appellee.

Franks, Sheldon, & Houser, PC By Todd Franks, Steven D. Sheldon, Phoenix, Attorneys for Respondent/Appellant.

OPINION

BARKER, Judge.

¶ 1 The issue before us in this opinion is the proper role of a best interests attorney ("BIA") in family court proceedings. For the following reasons, and those set forth in a simultaneously filed memorandum decision,1 we affirm in part, vacate in part and remand for a new trial on custody.

Facts and Procedural Background

¶ 2 Patricia K. Aksamit ("Mother") filed a petition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases