1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 218 P.3d
  5. 218 P.3d 1031 (2009)
 

STATE v. PATTERSON

No. 1 CA-CR 08-0610.

218 P.3d 1031 (2009)

STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Maurice PATTERSON, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A.

October 20, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terry Goddard, Arizona Attorney General by Kent E. Cattani, Chief Counsel, Criminal Appeals/Capital Litigation Section and Aaron J. Moskowitz, Assistant Attorney General, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellee.

Bruce F. Peterson, Legal Advocate by Consuelo M. Ohanesian, Deputy Legal Advocate, Phoenix, Attorneys for Appellant.

OPINION

BARKER, Judge.

¶ 1 This appeal asserts constitutional error based on an alleged geographical rule requiring a trial court confronted with conflicting decisions to follow the decision of the division of the court of appeals within which it is located. Finding that no such rule exists, we affirm Appellant's conviction and sentence.

I.

¶ 2 On June 9, 2008, a jury found Appellant Maurice Patterson guilty of possession of ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases